The PC's veer right at least fiscally. What's next?
Sunday, January 17, 2010 at 12:31PM Ted Morton has been appointed as the new Provincial Finance Minister, and according to the Premier's website, the third in order of precedence of all of the ministers in the legislature. It is obvious that Morton is considered the furthest right of the conservative cabinet and I am glad there are others in cabinet, including the Premier, who are more moderate in their social politics. There is little doubt that his appointment to Finance, as well as his power in the Cabinet, is a direct response to the concerns of Albertans who are concerned about the fiscal management (or mismanagement) of the current government. I would agree that this government has failed in managing it's spending.
Things have changed now, in my opinion, when it comes to fiscal leadership. I predict we will see a hard right-turn to balanced, pragmatic budgets. This is a good thing. A little belt-tightening will help more in the long-run than it hurts.
However, in our inadequate single political-spectrum reality, right-wing politics does not just mean fiscal hawkishness. To many, Conservatism means resisting progress in areas of social and family values. The dangerous mixture of religion and politics, government and education and legislating morality etc.
Interestingly, Morton is also a very vocal Social Conservative.
Here is some valuable insight into our new finance minister, gleaned from an Edmonton Journal Article written on May 26th, 2009 by columnist Paula Simons.
A decade ago, a Calgary professor and conservative activist named Ted Morton went to Geneva to deliver a speech to the World Congress of Families, an event sponsored by a U.S. think-tank called the Howard Center for Family, Religion and Society. Morton's speech was a passionate attack on "gender feminists and the gay rights movement" -- groups, he said, which "target the natural family as public enemy No. 1."
"According to the feminist-gay gospel, the great evils of this world are sexism and homophobia, and their breeding ground is the traditional family," Morton told his audience. "Hence, the gay-feminist project has become a social engineering project -- to use the coercive power of the state to undermine the existing family and to reconstruct in its place their gender-equal utopias."
To avoid the "soft despotism" of those he dubbed the New Egalitarians, Morton said it was vital to persuade governments around the world to subject all new legislation to a values test, to make sure that each new law supported "natural" family life. New laws, he argued, should be drafted to consider their impact on "parental rights and responsibilities -- especially the right to educate their children in the moral and spiritual traditions of their choice."
"Enlisting the coercive power of the state to force people to 'approve' homosexual relations is the antithesis of toleration," he said. "Toleration loses any meaning if we are not allowed to continue to disapprove of what we tolerate!"
What scares me, especially considering the above position of one of Governments most powerful ministers, is that there are many who would argue the Conservative party is no longer a Conservative party at all. That it is not far enough right, or that it is not doing enough to forward "conservative values".
Perhaps now we will get to see the dividing line on social issues between right, and right of right. Perhaps we will now get to learn if the Progressive in Progressive Conservative was meant for their stance on social progress.
At this point, at least in my very humble opinion, the PC Party has figured out half of the reason for discontent in this Province, I wonder if they have any idea what the other half is?
Alberta PC Party,
bill4,
premier ed stelmach,
progressive,
ted morton in
Alberta
Reader Comments (3)
The other half is that they refuse to pass further progressive legislation like Bill 44. With Rob Anderson gone, there's no hope of the PC party ever becoming "conservative" and respecting the rights of parents.
I predict we will see a hard right-turn to balanced, pragmatic budgets. This is a good thing. A little belt-tightening will help more in the long-run than it hurts.
The issue isn't balanced budgets but rather how to effectively fund critical services and infrastructure investments in a boom/bust economy. The year-to-year reaction to revenue changes, i.e. slashing when resource revenues are down and splurging when they are up, needs to be addressed with a longer-term strategy.
The 2010/2011 budget is being set right now. It will slash spending, result in a smaller government and put some strategic initiatives at risk. Many of the thousands of contract staff the gov't depends on will lose their jobs. Then, in six months or so, resource revenue will jump and they'll be explaining why health services are being de-insured and class sizes have increased when the province has a multi-billion dollar surplus... The next budget cycle will address these with increases -- then resource revenue will probably drop!
Why not prepare a longer term budget approach that accepts the reality of the boom/bust cycle, and accepts that 'belt tightening' is perhaps not necessary during down cycles -- especially if core services are at risk. That would be progressive government and the first party that comes up with such a budget approach gets my vote.
I share your concerns, Chris. Morton's academic publication record is also littered with absurd (if more subtle) references to excessive power held by gay people and feminists in Canadian society.