Real-Time Discussion
Categories
Subscribe to my Feed

About Chris
Links & Blog Roll
The Fine Print

Entries in ABLEG (18)

Monday
Aug022010

Sucking and blowing at the same time.

Imagine you are trying your damnedest to run a government. You think that you are making the best decisions for your constituents, based on your constitutional powers, extensive analysis, public dialogue, and a democratic process.

Then along comes some self-serving politicians from the next level of government, treading on your local issue, and making it his or her own. Politicizing that which is not theirs. Essentially hijacking your local issue, making it theirs, certainly for their own political gain. Then imagine that their interference might even do immeasurable harm to your local economy.

I know, it sounds insufferable. It also sounds like the recent decision by the Wildrose Alliance to interfere with the decision of Edmonton City Council and the decision of a majority TEN (10) City councillors to close the Edmonton City Center Airport.

If you saw this poorly written Twitter post (tweet) from Wildrose Alliance MLA Rob Anderson, you might even think that is what I was talking about:

But no, I am talking about the National Energy Program. For anyone with a local political memory, this was the moment in Alberta's history where the Liberal Party of Canada decided that it would cross the constitutionally established lines of governance and serve itself up a political solution to the economic crisis of Central Canada. At serious cost to the Alberta economy, and even greater political cost to itself.

I might even understand how you could confuse the two issues. Because in a way they seem quite similar.

That said, it's time for us to question the intent of the Wildrose in their position on our local airport issue. The economic/social gain or loss from closing it, is a decision that Edmonton and it's elected officials must make alone.

An elected MLA from Airdrie may be entitled to his opinion, but make no mistake, he and his counterparts with the Wildrose Alliance are not fighting a battle for Edmontonians, but fighting another one altogether; against the Provincial Conservatives.

This fight may not seem that important to you right now, especially if you support the City Centre Airport; but what happens next when the Wildrose Alliance are our Provincial government and negotiating with the City of Edmonton on Municipal Funding? A MUCH more important and ongoing delicate discussion which will require give and take from each side.

Can we trust them at that time to listen to the needs of our Council and Mayor? Or can we expect them to make decisions based on their political needs at that particular time, or those of the greater electorate?

Thursday
Jul292010

Lost in the numbers

NOTE: DUE TO MY LACK OF BEING ABLE TO RENDER HTML TABLES, AND THE AMOUNT OF BORING NUMBERS IN THIS POST, I EXPECT YOU TO FALL ASLEEP READING THIS. BUT AS I ALWAYS SAY, YOU GET WHAT YOU PAY FOR HERE.

When I read this article I am reminded of a saying learned long ago. "I may have been born at night, but not last night."

The crux of the article is how the Alberta Government just last year, spent $24 million terminating the employment of 450 nurses (for approx $53,000 each), in response to what Health Minister Gene Zwozdesky called "the worst global recession that’s hit since the 1930s". The article then talks about the prior year and how Alberta and Albertans were literally dying for nurses. We were short 1500 nurses and were recruiting from the Phillipines, India and the United Kingdom.

Of course the article goes on to say how we now again have a nursing shortage and the budget allows for hiring many of the same 450 positions back.

So, as much as I detest digging through the numbers, I was very interested in how the planning of such things looks from hindsight. Not surprisingly, it looks like simple bad planning on the surface.

Budget vs Actual Results from 09/10

Total Budgeted Revenue  -  $31.677 Billion

Total Actual Revenue  -  $35.652 Billion  ($3.985 Billion OVER budget)

Total Base Budget for Health Services  -  $12.935 Billion

Total Actual Health Services Costs  -  $12.946 Billion ($11 Million over budget)

So, we at least have to see what was an obvious and blatant OOPS, which if being honest our government would have been well aware of at some point in mid 2009/2010 budget year. I am prepared to forgive this OOPS on the revenue line, but I can only surmise that the government entered a slash at all costs mentality at some point mid-year and decided to cut the 450 jobs, reduce healthcare service to Albertans, and incur the $24 Million one-time expense.

But this is where Minister Zwozdesky's simple statement starts to rub me the wrong way.

2010 / 2011 Budget

Total Budgeted revenue  -  $34 Billion

Total Budgeted base-funding Health expense  -  $14.3 Billion (an increase of nearly 10% over 09/10)

"Ok Chris, this is getting boring, please move on to your point....."

My point is this. The government simply screwed up, IF you want to give them the benefit of the doubt. But even if the government did THINK that 2009/2010 revenue was expected to hit the original lower number, they had a choice to make about terminating 450 nurses to bring the health budget back into line. It's around the same time they were making that choice, that they were budgeting for 2010/2011, and assumed a new revenue number of $34 Billion.

I am sure that budgeting a $34 Billion enterprise is a difficult excercise, and although I have built and managed many budgets, (not Billions but over $100 million), I know more that mistakes in the 10-20% range are not only possible, but very likely. Especially in a resource based economy like ours.

So my point, in summary (I am even starting to bore myself):

It's OK to be wrong. But when it is very obvious that you screwed up, and sometimes even when you are being pressed by your competition, it is best to simply say so. The truth probably lies somewhere between a knee-jerk reaction by the Premier and Minister Liepert at the time to cut costs, even recklessly, and the government actually not knowing what 2010/2011 might bring.

The mistake is maybe even forgiveable. But not accepting responsibility and refusing to work towards a culture of improved planning and treating employees and our tax dollars with humility, is not.

Finally, I must give credit where credit is due. Much has been written about Minister Dave Hancock agreeing to underwite operating deficits in the Education budget, so teacher lay-off can be avoided while hiring cycles took their course. We need to recognize that for the leadership and good planning that it was. Oh, and yes kudos to the Liberals for pointing it out.

BUDGET FILES USED FOR THIS POST:

2009 / 2010 budget vs. actual

2010 / 2011 budget

Sunday
May162010

Alberta Liberals fail to inspire, plan to conspire.

My whole life, Chrysler has struggled under a mediocre brand, constant quality issues and a failure to innovate meaningfully. GM, not much better, has suffered under it's own bureacratic weight, lack of productivity, and perhaps even worse innovation.

No surprise, both these companies required major government bailouts, and are still trying to sell the same vehicles to the public. Now imagine this.

General Motors and Chrysler decide to "co-operate" in an effort to steal more market share from other competitors. But instead of a merger, they are simply going to agree not to compete with each other in strategic markets, or perhaps they would co-operate in speaking out against their combined competitors.

So keeping this anology in perspective, ask yourself how the customer receives greater value from either of these companies? Do the cars get better for the customer? Will they be able to change the perceived needs and wants of the customer, by offering LESS CHOICE? Of course not. Frankly, they would be conspiring to SCREW the customer, or at very least the SYSTEM, by playing games with the market instead of innovating, and adding more desired products for their customers.

Of course in the world of industry, there is no way in the world this would work. Firstly it would be against the law, secondly it would not grow the market share for either company, as customers will just laugh in the face of the conspirators, step around them and buy what they want.

Now, imagine we were talking about political parties, in a first-past-the-post election. You could argue that then things are different. That vote-splitting would be reduced and the conspirators could come out ahead.

Do the electorate get a better product? Or is it simply the best way to keep your failing brand from really innovating? We know the obvious answers to these questions, and yet the old-school win at all costs mentality of people losing grip on power, makes the self-serving option seem to make sense. But at what long-term cost?

To be clear, I am not talking abour a merger of the parties, which in my opinion would have some benefits. But that would require coming from two completely different locations on the political spectrum and trying to appease the grassroots of each. So a merger MIGHT create a better product (assuming moderate policies) for the customer, but the special influencers of the NDP (Union friendly and anti-business left wingers), and the smarter-than-the-average-Albertan egos of the Liberal Leadership, would never get this done.

So, in my personal opinion, it's simply old-school politics and a bailout of those who have failed to inspire Albertans. Me, I'll look for a new mode of transportation, built to function in a 2010 political economy.

Thursday
Apr292010

My Big Listen Thoughts

As some of you know, I hosted 12 people in my home who were for the most part strangers in real life but people I have come to know in my "social media community" or others who were told that they had to come check out what this big listen was all about. I will not frame for you what was said tonight, but I do want to tell you about how it made me feel, and why I am involved in this initiative for the Alberta Party.

Firstly, some background. I am on the Provincial Board of Directors of the Alberta Party, and these are my thoughts, feelings and words, and not that of our Party.

That said, I should share for you what The Big Listen is. The Big Listen is an attempt by the newly re-activated Alberta Party to find some common themes among Albertans, collect that information in an methodic and well documented approach, and begin the discernment process towards developing policy ideas and eventually resolutions to be voted on this fall at our policy convention.

The process feels backwards and even a waste of time for some of those who are clamouring for more information or immediate action. Some even feel that it is a naive, mealy-mouthed way to not get anything done, but to talk ourselves to inaction. That is simply incorrect.

A Big Listen House Party is an organized attempt to get average citizens into a safe and friendly environment where they can talk about what their pressures are, what their hopes are and finally to summarize what they are grateful about in Alberta. But rest assured, in expressing these pressures, hopes and gratitudes, we are starting a process of listening to and organizing the wishes of the community into our policy. These are the goals of my house meeting tonight which I shared with those who attended:

  • Build new relationships and community networks
  • Creating space for people to reflect and names their pressures/hopes
  • To make talking politics (life/circumstance/vision) okay again
  • Move from isolation to community
  • Build a ground level campaign base

So by these standards I will admit to it being a big success, but more importantly I want to share with you how I FELT about the process and why I THINK it is the only way to start a real and meaningful political movement that focuses on the wishes of Albertans, as opposed to sticking with top-down sound bites formed by a few.

I feel that there is a reason to be hopeful about how community dialogue, when it is stripped of partisanship, can be very interesting, personal and constructive. I found that our concerns and hopes were actually quite similar even though our perceived or real ideological differences were quite broad. I feel more than ever that people want good governance, real democracy, and an innovative government that acts on the wishes of the people more than they want platitudes, sound bites and short-sightedness.

None of those things are the domain of any one ideology. Yet I sense that there is a feeling among a majority of Albertans that the present mainstream parties are not open, humble or transparent enough to let other ideas into the mix. In fact it feels to me like ideology is the only defining factor or prerequisite to current participants in the political process. There is resounding evidence, not the least of which are our voter turnouts, to suggest that only those who identify with an existing ideological stance are engaged and participating in democracy. In my opinion that leaves too many, largely "centrists" or "moderates", who are disengaged from the process.

So from tonight I gained more confidence that my party is making an attempt at acting differently. There are those who say that we must take a stand for things, first put out to Albertans what our policies are. I am more and more convinced that we must continue to do the opposite. Policies will come, that is a certainty, but they must come from the largest and most representative segment of our population possible. The Big Listen IS NOT a party member initiative. One of our founding principles of the campaign is that anyone can attend them, and anyone can submit their ideas to our discernment process. (We do of course have Guideposts which outline the Big Listen process, which I have blogged about here).

There are others who are adamant that we must have a dynamic and charismatic well-known leader before we can get anywhere, or capture the imagination of Joe Albertan. Rest assured, if we build our party on integrity and principles which respect our guidelines of transparency and democracy, and we avoid settling in on the best of who we can attract TODAY, we will find such a person. In fact I think this party has the potential to redefine how parliamentary democracies function, by finding many great community and thought leaders and giving them more voice in the party, caucus and hopefully government. The Leader of a party is an important representative of the people of the party as opposed to the people of a party being a reflection of what the leader is about.

So sticking with how I feel about this movement, I must say that I am firmly committed to a process which to me is more respectful, open, transparent and democratic than any current alternative.

But make no mistake, this is a Party that wants to actually implement government policy, govern and lead Albertans. I am under no illusions, nor are my fellow board or party members, that this can happen without many things. We DO have solid plans to release and share the results of our Big Listen. We must also raise money and find members to help carry the political load that is ahead of us. And finally we must organize constituency associations, find great local candidates and watch a leader emerge from all of that. But at least in my opinion, you don't start there, and leave behind the actual people who right now are sick and tired of politics being done to benefit the politicians, or the parties only.

For the impatient ones, or those who are still cynical about our Party or any party for that matter, I simply encourage you to stay tuned. Over the next few days and weeks, you will begin to see how we treat the process we have started, and just how committed we are to maintaining a process of openness, democracy and innovation in politics.

Note: If you would like to get involved, host or attend a Big Listen Event, buy a membership, donate to our party, or submit your ideas for policy discernment, please visit our website to share your contact information. If you're not yet comfortable doing that, please contact me directly to learn more (chris.labossiereATgmail.com).

Tuesday
Apr132010

The Big Listen... with wine

As most of my readers know, I am a member of the Alberta Party and sit as a director on the Provincial Board. When I post my personal thoughts here, they are never on behalf of the party.

That said, I am excited about the potential of this grassroots initiative and I am particularly excited about the Alberta Party "Big Listen" process. With it, we are reaching out across the province and talking to Albertans about what is concerning them and things that they are hoping to see in our future.

The Big Listen is basically a small, personal, event-based initiative where we will gather the ideas of thousands of Albertans (who do NOT need to be party members), and submit the ideas and comments into a well-structured process to help develop our policies. By keeping the process organic, inviting, and non-threatening, we hope to invigorate the disenfranchised and capture the hopes, dreams and concerns of regular Albertans.

So, I am announcing that I will be hosting a Big Listen event in my home, and I would like to see some of my readers who are interested in the process join me. The event will be limited to 90 minutes of discussion, and ideally about 10 people. It will also be a fun time to get together, meet some new friends and enjoy some different wines. I am planning to have the event on Thursday April 29th at 7:30 pm. Please email me at chris.labossiere-AT-gmail.com if you have some interest or questions.

One of the pressing questions I get often, is "what does the Alberta Party stand for?". Of course as we have suspended our previous policies in anticipation of new ideas from the Big Listen and a full-blown policy convention; I can not refer you to an offical policy document. However, our party DOES have principles and "guideposts" which will help shape the policy work needed to be done, and help people understand a little more about where are party stands on certain things. I am happy now to be able to share these with you. You will find these and much more information released within 2-3 weeks on a completely revised and extended website, at www.AlbertaParty.ca.

Big Listen Guideposts

The Alberta Party is committed to building a policy framework that is based on the following six key values:

Prosperity

We believe that private enterprise and entrepreneurship are the keys to our economic success. The government should foster an environment which facilitates economic investment, reduces red tape and encourages creativity.

Fiscal Responsibility

We believe that government must use public dollars as effectively and efficiently as possible. The government should balance the books and set aside money for a raining day.  This is best accomplished through long-term planning, common sense and transparency.

Social Responsibility

We believe every Albertan deserves the opportunity to succeed. Our government should aspire to provide excellent and innovative public education, public health care, and infrastructure, as well as a compassionate helping hand in times of need. We believe this can be accomplished through responsible use of public funds.

We believe that sustainability must be a core value of government. Rethinking unsustainable practices, making strategic investments in research and technology, and implementing  smart policy choices will protect and enhance our environment for future generations.

Democracy

We believe that public business should be conducted in public.  Government should ensure that the legislative process is open, fair, transparent and inclusive of the people it governs.  Our government should foster debate, actively engage citizens,and make itself accountable to the people it governs.

Quality of life

We believe  that a great quality of life requires strong communities. Through support of recreation, sports, arts and culture,  government can help to build strong and vibrant communities.

Alberta Party Principles

The Alberta Party was established in 1985 and has established the principles set forth below:

“We believe in:

  • True equality for every citizen, with equal rights and responsibilities for all and special privileges for none.
  • Liberty of conscience and religion and the right of every citizen to advocate, without fear of repression, public policies that reflect his or her fundamental beliefs.
  • A citizen’s inalienable right, individually and collectively, to own and dispose of property which cannot be confiscated for any purpose whatsoever without due process of law and fair compensation.Elected representatives are accountable to the citizens with no individual, group or government above or beyond the law.”
  • Elected representatives are accountable to the citizens with no individual, group or government above or beyond the law.”